Photo Illustration by Sarah Rogers/The Daily Beast/Getty
The other day, the sting operation dubbed Operation Varsity Blues exposed a long list of well-heeled and well-known parents who rigged the college-admissions process, in part by paying proctors and ringers to take or correct tests for his or her kids. Not long after news regarding the scheme broke, critics rushed to indicate that celebrity parents like Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman didn’t want to break what the law states to game the system.
For the ultra-rich, big contributions could easily get their name on a science building and their offspring a spot at a top-tier school—an option California Gov. Gavin Newsom recently called “legal bribery.” Perhaps the moderately wealthy can grease the admissions process with extensive SAT tutoring or, more problematically, college application essay editing.
When you look at the admissions process, there’s a top premium in the personal statement, a 500-word essay submitted through the normal Application, about some foible or lesson, which aims to give readers a better sense of the student than, say, a standardized test score. More than one university and advising blog rank the essay one of the “most important” areas of the process; one consultant writing in the brand new York Times described it as “the purest part of the application.”
But while test scores are completed because of the student alone—barring bribed proctors, that is—any amount of people can modify an essay before submission, opening it as much as exploitation and less-than-pure tactics at the hands of helicopter parents or expensive college-prep counselors who focus on the one percent.
In interviews utilizing the Daily Beast, eight college application tutors shed light from the economy of editing, altering, and, often times, outright rewriting statements that are personal. The essay editors, who agreed to speak in the condition of anonymity because so many still work with their field, painted the portrait of an industry rife with ethical hazards, where in fact the line between helping and cheating can become difficult to draw.
The employees who spoke into the Daily Beast often struggled to obtain companies with similar approaches to essay writing. For many, tutors would Skype with students early on within the application process to brainstorm ideas. (“i might say there have been lots of instances of hammering kids with potential ideas,” one tutor said. “Like, ‘That’s a terrible idea for an essay, why don’t you try this instead?’”) Then, the student would write a draft, and bounce back edits using their tutor, who would grade it in accordance with a standardized rubric, which included categories like spelling, sentence structure, style, or whether or not it was “bullshit-free.”
Most made between $30 and $100 each hour, or just around $1,000 for helping a student through the entire application process, in certain cases focusing on as many as 18 essays at a time for assorted schools. Two tutors who worked for the company that is same they got an additional benefit if clients were accepted at their target universities.
One consultant, a Harvard that is 22-year-old graduate told The Daily Beast that, during his senior year in college, he began working as an essay editor for a company that hires Ivy Leaguers to tutor applicants on a variety of subjects. When he took the job in September 2017, the business was still young and fairly informal. Managers would send him essays via email, plus the tutor would revise and return them, with ranging from a 24-hour and turnaround that is two-week. But from the beginning, the consultant explained, his managers were “pretty explicit” that the work entailed less editing than rewriting.
“When it is done, it requires to be good enough for the student to attend that school, whether which means lying, making things through to behalf regarding the student, or basically just changing anything so that it could be acceptable,” he told The Daily Beast. “I’ve edited anywhere from 200 to 225 essays. So, probably like 150 students total. I would personally say about 50 percent were entirely rewritten.”
In a single particularly egregious instance, the tutor said, a student submitted an essay on hip-hop, which named his 3 or 4 favorite rappers, but lacked a definite narrative. The tutor said he rewrote the essay to share with the story for the student moving to America, struggling for connecting with an American stepfamily, but eventually finding a link through rap. “I rewrote the essay such that it said. you know, he discovered that through his stepbrother he could connect through rap music and achieving a stepbrother teach him about rap music, and I talked about it loving-relation thing. I don’t know if that was true. He just said he liked rap essay help music.”
In the long run, the tutor said, his company shifted its work model. In place of sending him random, anonymous essays, the managers started to assign him students to oversee through the entire college application cycle. “They thought it looked better,” the tutor said. “So if I get some student, ‘Abby Whatever,’ I would personally write all 18 of her essays so that it would look like it was all one voice. I experienced this year that is past students into the fall, and I wrote almost all their essays for the Common App and anything else.”
Don't assume all consultant was as explicit concerning the editing world’s ambiguities that are moral. One administrator emphasized that his company’s policies were firmly anti-cheating. He conceded, however, that the principles are not always followed: “Bottom line is: it can take additional time for a member of staff to sit with a student and help them evauluate things for themselves, than it will to simply do so. We had problems in the past with people cutting corners. We’ve also had problems in the past with students asking for corners to be cut.”
Another consultant who struggled to obtain the company that is same later became the assistant director of U.S. operations told The Daily Beast that while rewriting was not overtly encouraged, it had been also not strictly prohibited.
“The precise terms were: I was getting paid a lump sum payment in exchange for helping this student with this App that is common essay supplement essays at a couple of universities. I became given a rubric of qualities when it comes to essay, and I also was told that the essay needed to score a point that is certain that rubric,” he said. “It was never clear that anything legal was at our way, we were just told which will make essays—we were told and we also told tutors—to make the essays meet a quality that is certain and, you realize, we didn’t ask a lot of questions regarding who wrote what.”
Lots of the tutors told The Daily Beast that their customers were often international students, seeking suggestions about how to break into the university system that is american. A few of the foreign students, four associated with eight tutors told The Daily Beast, ranged inside their English ability and required significant rewriting. One consultant, a freelancer who stumbled into tutoring into the fall of 2017 after a classmate needed anyone to take his clients over, recounted the story of a female applicant with little-to-no English skills.
“Her parents had me appear in and look after all her college essays. The design they were taken to me in was essentially unreadable. I mean there were the bare workings of a narrative here—even the grasp on English is tenuous,” he said. “I believe that, you realize, to be able to read and write in English would be variety of a prerequisite for an university that is american. However these parents really don’t worry about that at all. They’re going to pay whoever to help make the essays look like whatever to have their kids into school.”
The tutor continued to advise this client, doing “numerous, numerous edits on this essay that is girl’s until she was later accepted at Columbia University. But not long for help with her English courses after she matriculated, the tutor said she reached back out to him. “She doesn’t understand how to write essays, and she’s struggling in class,” he told The Daily Beast. “i actually do the assistance for this that I can, but I say to the parents, ‘You know, you did not prepare her. She is put by you in this position’. Because obviously, the relevant skills essential to be at Columbia—she doesn’t have those skills.”
The Daily Beast reached off to numerous college planning and tutoring programs together with National Association for College Admissions Counseling, but none responded to requests to go over their policies on editing versus rewriting.
The American Association of College Registrars and Admissions Officers also declined comment, and top universities such as Harvard, Yale, Princeton, the University of Pennsylvania, Cornell, Dartmouth, and Brown would not respond or declined touch upon the way they guard against essays being written by counselors or tutors. Stanford said in a statement which they “have no policy that is specific reference to the essay portion of the application.”